So, the PERSEUS trial has been completed, recruitment is complete, and we are now following these patients for a longer time to see if we can really acknowledge that the quadruplet with dara-VRd is definitely better than the triplet without dara. And I think it looks like that in all the interim analyses that we have done. But the projected progression-free survival is quite long, between 12 and 17 years...
So, the PERSEUS trial has been completed, recruitment is complete, and we are now following these patients for a longer time to see if we can really acknowledge that the quadruplet with dara-VRd is definitely better than the triplet without dara. And I think it looks like that in all the interim analyses that we have done. But the projected progression-free survival is quite long, between 12 and 17 years. And we have to wait for some more follow-up before we know what the benefit of adding dara will be. But for sure, the quadruplet is better than the triplet. We can say that now already. Other analyses are being performed as well. For example, the role of circulating tumor cells, circulating plasma myeloma cells, which is significant and an independent prognostic factor. And also the new criteria for high-risk disease have been implemented and have been analyzed, and this will be published hopefully soon. And then we will also publish the projected progression-free survival as done by the NICE criteria with different statistical models. This has been presented a couple of times already at clinical meetings, but now we are going to submit this for publication. And more analysis will follow, especially on the subgroup of high-risk patients that achieve Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity, what will be the long-term outcome of this group of patients compared to patients that do not achieve MRD negativity or patients treated in the VRd arm.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.