Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel is supported with funding from AbbVie (Platinum), Sanofi (Gold), Legend Biotech (Bronze), and through an educational grant from Alexion Pharma GmbH.

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

EHA 2026 | The future of myeloma therapy: moving toward safer frontline immunotherapy approaches

Fredrik Schjesvold, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, shares his insights into the future of multiple myeloma treatment, highlighting the need for safer immunotherapies for frontline treatment and notes that newer therapies with lower toxicity and less frequent dosing may be key to achieving this goal. This interview took place at the 31st Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Stockholm, Sweden.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think it depends on what the future is, where do you set the sort of year mark for that, but I would say that it’s a combination of earlier immunotherapy and new drugs. Because what I do think is that the immunotherapies we have today, approved on the market, not in frontline, but later-line, their non-relapse mortality and their dangerous toxicities in too large a fraction of the patients makes it difficult to put all first-line patients on these treatments, especially if they are standard risk and have a good prognosis...

I think it depends on what the future is, where do you set the sort of year mark for that, but I would say that it’s a combination of earlier immunotherapy and new drugs. Because what I do think is that the immunotherapies we have today, approved on the market, not in frontline, but later-line, their non-relapse mortality and their dangerous toxicities in too large a fraction of the patients makes it difficult to put all first-line patients on these treatments, especially if they are standard risk and have a good prognosis. So what I think the future will be is that some of the newer immunotherapies, which look like they have less toxicity, dosed less frequently, proving that that is not carrying along fatal and very unpopular side effects in frontline. So immunotherapy into frontline, but we need to show that it is safe enough and it doesn’t look safe enough with the drugs we have now in relapse. So I think it’s a combination of getting immunotherapy there but maybe with drugs that are actually not on the market yet.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...