With the data coming from these two prospective clinical trials that were looking at second line, I think that CAR-T should be used in this specific subgroup of patients in second line and not in third line. For instance, the ZUMA-7 trial has been able to demonstrate, not only benefits in front of the standard of care in terms of event-free survival, but there was a press release indicating that there were benefits also in terms of overall survival...
With the data coming from these two prospective clinical trials that were looking at second line, I think that CAR-T should be used in this specific subgroup of patients in second line and not in third line. For instance, the ZUMA-7 trial has been able to demonstrate, not only benefits in front of the standard of care in terms of event-free survival, but there was a press release indicating that there were benefits also in terms of overall survival. And this indicates that in spite of the fact that many of the patients failing the standard of care were treated with CAR T in third line, that the use of CAR T in second line failure and eventually improve the overall survival in these patients. So, in principle with the data that we have, CAR T in specific subgroups of patients should be better used in second and not in third line or plus.