Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

CAR-T Meeting 2022 | CAR-T therapy in second-line for NHL: ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM & BELINDA

Anna Sureda, MD, PhD, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Duran I Reynals Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, discusses the results of the ZUMA-7 (NCT03391466), TRANSFORM (NCT03575351), and BELINDA (NCT03570892) trials comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and tisagenlecleucel respectively to standard of care (SOC) with chemoimmunotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the second-line setting. Whilst BELINDA did not report any benefit for patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-Ts) over SOC, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM showed significant improvements for patients treated with CAR-Ts in terms of event-free survival (EFS), quality of life (QoL) and patient-reported outcomes, and reported a tolerable safety profile. These results may change the SOC for patients with primary refractory or early relapsed NHL. This interview took place at the EBMT-EHA 4th European CAR T-cell Meeting which was held virtually in 2022.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

At the last ASH meeting, as I have mentioned, we were able to see the results of three different Phase III prospective clinical trials. The design is not exactly the same in the three of them.
So ZUMA-7 for axi-cel, BELINDA for tisa-cel, and then TRANSFORM for liso-cel. But in summary, these three prospective clinical trials compared face-to-face in patients with primary refractory disease or in patients with early relapse, that in principle were transplant-eligible, the standard of care, so chemoimmunotherapy plus consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation versus the three different CAR-T products...

At the last ASH meeting, as I have mentioned, we were able to see the results of three different Phase III prospective clinical trials. The design is not exactly the same in the three of them.
So ZUMA-7 for axi-cel, BELINDA for tisa-cel, and then TRANSFORM for liso-cel. But in summary, these three prospective clinical trials compared face-to-face in patients with primary refractory disease or in patients with early relapse, that in principle were transplant-eligible, the standard of care, so chemoimmunotherapy plus consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation versus the three different CAR-T products. Two of these trials, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM were positive. So basically both of them demonstrated that the event-free survival for those patients that were treated with the CAR-T constructs was significantly better than the standard of care. And the medium follow-up was longer for the ZUMA-7. If we talk about overall survival, there were no significant differences in terms of overall survival between both arms, but still the follow-up is quite short. And probably we are seeing the beneficial impact of using cellular therapy as a third-line treatment. The safety profile was also quite favorable to the ‘experimental arm, and also the quality of life and patient-reported outcome measures.
So probably just because of this data coming from these two prospective clinical trials, maybe in the near future, the standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary refractory, or with early relapse will change both in the U.S and in Europe.

Read more...

Disclosures

Honoraria: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, Gilead Kite, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion
Consultancy: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi
Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda
Research support: Takeda, BMS/Celgene