There’s been an ongoing challenge around whether reading out progression-free survival is going to truly mark out an improvement in overall survival in trials which show an earlier improvement in PFS. We’re starting to understand the link between PFS and overall survival better but in the real world there’s been not much in the way of data and what we’re currently doing is using registries such as PREAMBLE and also Flatiron database...
There’s been an ongoing challenge around whether reading out progression-free survival is going to truly mark out an improvement in overall survival in trials which show an earlier improvement in PFS. We’re starting to understand the link between PFS and overall survival better but in the real world there’s been not much in the way of data and what we’re currently doing is using registries such as PREAMBLE and also Flatiron database. We are looking at whether progression-free survival really translates to improved overall survival and using the set of features which define relapsed/refractory myeloma, we are able to demonstrate that achieving a progression-free survival can improve overall survival in this patient population. So how is this going to be useful? We’re going to have more and more therapies which are going to be reading out with the progression-free survival outcome, and this will give both practicing clinicians, patients, and regulators more confidence to be able to use PFS as an endpoint to approve and give access to these agents for patients.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.