It’s important that clinicians recognize that this is a subset of patients who have a poor clinical outcome and therefore trying to monitor their disease very closely is critically important. So that’s one message. The second message I would give is often when we start patients on therapy, we all are quite happy then that they respond. And if they get a deeper response, like a very good partial response or a complete response, I mean, to a degree, we think that these patients may do well...
It’s important that clinicians recognize that this is a subset of patients who have a poor clinical outcome and therefore trying to monitor their disease very closely is critically important. So that’s one message. The second message I would give is often when we start patients on therapy, we all are quite happy then that they respond. And if they get a deeper response, like a very good partial response or a complete response, I mean, to a degree, we think that these patients may do well. But unfortunately, what we’re observing is even though these patients may get into a complete response or a very good partial response these patients will relapse earlier. So the earlier response that we see in these patients should not be an indicator for a better long-term outcome in these patients and therefore you need to continue to look at how do I maintain these patients in this deeper response meaning what best maintenance therapy I can give to these patients, are there clinical trials that I can include these patients into, which can give them access to a lot of these novel immunotherapies. So that’s my main message to oncologists.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.