Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

EBMT 2022 | Transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma in the context of targeted immunotherapy

Anna Sureda, MD, PhD, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Duran I Reynals Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, discusses the place of transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma, arguing that their indication has remained stable over the years. The outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) have improved considerably with the use of consolidation strategies after transplantation. In the future, treatment with brentuximab vedotin or checkpoint inhibitors may replace autoSCT in relapsed or refractory patients who achieve complete remission. Regarding allogeneic SCT (alloSCT), which is normally reserved for patients who relapse after autoSCT, its use has been reduced in the last years and moved to later phases of the disease. This interview took place at the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 2022, which was held virtually.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

Stem cell transplantation or the indication for stem cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma have remained quite stable over the last few years. So, basically, we are considering autologous transplant for those patients that are primary refractory or that are in the first relapse after first-line conventional chemotherapy.

Over the last few years, we have been able to improve the results of autologous stem cell transplantation, basically, by increasing the percentage of patients that achieve a metabolic complete remission with the first-line salvage chemotherapy, and with the use of consolidation strategies after autologous stem transplantation in those patients that are at a high risk of relapse...

Stem cell transplantation or the indication for stem cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma have remained quite stable over the last few years. So, basically, we are considering autologous transplant for those patients that are primary refractory or that are in the first relapse after first-line conventional chemotherapy.

Over the last few years, we have been able to improve the results of autologous stem cell transplantation, basically, by increasing the percentage of patients that achieve a metabolic complete remission with the first-line salvage chemotherapy, and with the use of consolidation strategies after autologous stem transplantation in those patients that are at a high risk of relapse. Maybe in the future, we will be able to avoid autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with primary refractory or with relapsed disease that achieve a metabolic complete remission with salvage strategies by substituting autologous stem cell transplantation by one or the other of the two new drugs that we have nowadays, or maybe not-so-new drugs, brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors.

If we talk about allogeneic stem cell transplant, allo-transplant have been, basically, dedicated to those patients that relapse after an autologous stem cell transplantation, and at least for the time being, is the only curative strategy that we have for these patients. But, in this specific setting, we have seen, over the last few years, the introduction of newer treatments, as I have mentioned before, brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors, are very effective treatments with a lower toxicity or a better toxicity profile in comparison with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. And this has made the numbers of allogeneic stem cell transplantations decrease over time and also move the allogeneic stem cell transplantation indication to later phases of the disease. Although, we know that the combination of checkpoint inhibitors, and then an allogeneic stem cell transplantation to consolidate the results of checkpoint inhibitors, are able to give, really, very interesting results.

Read more...

Disclosures

Honoraria: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, Gilead Kite, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion
Consultancy: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi
Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda
Research support: Takeda, BMS/Celgene