I’m really excited to be at ASCO this year presenting my work on genetic signatures of CNS relapse and DLBCL. We just had a great oral abstract discussion. So our study involved taking 155 patients with DLBCL who had undergone NGS at UCSF and looking at their genetic subtypes using the two genetic classifiers in the field, LymphGen and DLBclass, and we found that two of the high-risk subtypes, MCD and C5, had a much higher risk for CNS relapse, around 20% in two years compared to 6% for the other patients...
I’m really excited to be at ASCO this year presenting my work on genetic signatures of CNS relapse and DLBCL. We just had a great oral abstract discussion. So our study involved taking 155 patients with DLBCL who had undergone NGS at UCSF and looking at their genetic subtypes using the two genetic classifiers in the field, LymphGen and DLBclass, and we found that two of the high-risk subtypes, MCD and C5, had a much higher risk for CNS relapse, around 20% in two years compared to 6% for the other patients. So this is a really important finding in terms of identifying patients up front who may have CNS relapse, which is a really devastating event for patients with DLBCL and an unmet need. I think, you know, certainly our study suggests that using NGS up front at diagnosis for patients with DLBCL can help us identify patients at high-risk for CNS relapse, which I think is a clinically actionable finding. I think one of the questions that came up in our session was, can we prevent these relapses? And I think that’s an outstanding question. But I think the main takeaway from our work is that these MCD and C5 patients have a much higher risk of CNS relapse, and I think we need better prophylactic options for them beyond just high-dose methotrexate, which is the current prophylactic standard.