Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

COMy 2022 | The importance of the transcriptome and gene expression profiling in multiple myeloma

In this video, Jill Corre, PharmD, PhD, The Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole (IUCT), Toulouse, France, discusses the importance of the transcriptome and gene expression profiling in understanding multiple myeloma. Dr Corre first highlights how the expression of various genes is linked to high-risk patients, and the importance of continuing to improve methods of gene expression profiling. Dr Corre then explains how techniques such as RNA sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to identify transcriptome modifiers, and further emphasizes the importance of the transcriptome in allowing clinicians and researchers to better understand the biology of disease. This interview took place at the 8th World Congress on Controversies in Multiple Myeloma (COMy) 2022, held in Paris, France.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

In 2007, there was a crucial study from the Arkansas group showing that expression profile of 70 genes can be used to identify high-risk myeloma patients, about 10, 15%. And this recent genome challenge confirmed recently that this signature was able to discriminate patients with more recent treatment. It is possible to improve a gene expression profile by incorporating other scoring systems such as the ISS but also such as age...

In 2007, there was a crucial study from the Arkansas group showing that expression profile of 70 genes can be used to identify high-risk myeloma patients, about 10, 15%. And this recent genome challenge confirmed recently that this signature was able to discriminate patients with more recent treatment. It is possible to improve a gene expression profile by incorporating other scoring systems such as the ISS but also such as age. But the problem is that between all the signatures that have been described, there is almost no genes overlap between this signature suggesting maybe a lack of reproducibility and that each signature misses some high-risk patients. So despite efforts to try to combine this signature, the role of gene expression profile remains questionable in assessing the risk. In fact, by comparison with microarray, new tools such as RNA sequencing, next-generation sequencing allow to identify transcriptome modifiers such as splicing mechanisms, long intergenic non-coding RNA. And these elements are also a marker of aggressive disease. So it can be useful to look at this. In fact, for me, the transcriptome is an imperfect tool for assessing the risk, but it’s a key tool to the link between the DNA and the protein, so to understand the biology of plasma cell disease.

Read more...