Yesterday I presented the registry CASSIOPEIA, the long-term analysis of CASSIOPEIA with 96% of patients from the original population with 8.5 years median follow-up, the longest reported for quadruplets. And CASSIOPEIA is now a long and old story. The design was done more than 10 years ago. And it showed how daratumumab transformed myeloma outcomes, but it also shows how MRD is a precious tool for the myeloma community...
Yesterday I presented the registry CASSIOPEIA, the long-term analysis of CASSIOPEIA with 96% of patients from the original population with 8.5 years median follow-up, the longest reported for quadruplets. And CASSIOPEIA is now a long and old story. The design was done more than 10 years ago. And it showed how daratumumab transformed myeloma outcomes, but it also shows how MRD is a precious tool for the myeloma community. MRD is important because it can identify deep, but above all, sustained responses to treatment. So in the Cassiopeia trial, we observed that among patients treated with the full DARA arm, the patients who received Dara-VTd plus DARA maintenance, one out of four patients reached a negative MRD status sustained during five years. And this response is associated with an excellent outcome, since when you reach such a response, 42 months after the last MRD assessment, 87% of patients are free of relapse. So it shows you how the depth of the response is very important, but the sustained response is very important. And on the contrary, if you lose your MRD negativity, the risk of progression is doubled. So Cassiopeia is maybe the first trial showing how MRD is important for us and how MRD can identify some patients with an excellent outcome.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.