Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel is supported with funding from AbbVie (Platinum), Sanofi (Gold), Legend Biotech (Bronze), and through an educational grant from Alexion Pharma GmbH.

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

IMS 2026 | Prophylactic cyclophosphamide for delayed neurotoxicity after cilta-cel in multiple myeloma

Yi Lin, MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, discusses prophylactic cyclophosphamide for patients with multiple myeloma at increased risk of delayed neurotoxicity following ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) therapy. She highlights findings showing no reduction in the incidence of Parkinsonism among patients with high lymphocyte expansion, but suggests that symptoms may be less severe with cyclophosphamide prophylaxis. This interview took place at the 23rd International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting in Glasgow, UK.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So in clinical practice now, we have the potential opportunity to use CAR-T cell therapy for patients as early as second-line treatment after they become enzalutamide refractory. And it’s very exciting that we’ve seen overall survival advantage too from randomized control studies compared to conventional triplets in addition to the primary endpoint of prolonged progression-free survival...

So in clinical practice now, we have the potential opportunity to use CAR-T cell therapy for patients as early as second-line treatment after they become enzalutamide refractory. And it’s very exciting that we’ve seen overall survival advantage too from randomized control studies compared to conventional triplets in addition to the primary endpoint of prolonged progression-free survival. However, despite some of these strategies to try to reduce disease burden going in, there’s still a very small percent of the patients, likely somewhere around 1% of the patients, who may be at risk for developing some delayed neurotoxicities, such as ICANS-associated Parkinsonism. And so even though it’s rare, because these symptoms can last, and previously we were seeing more severe manifestations of that, it’s important for us to see what we can do to reduce the risk for patients to develop this. And so we have recently published our experience where we found that for patients during the time of CAR-T cell expansion, if their lymphocyte count gets above the normal range, so for a clinical lab that is typically around three, when it gets above three, the risk of developing Parkinsonism goes from somewhere around 1% to likely around 12%, so it gets higher. So it is that patient population that we try to do some early preventative strategies. So previously we have done prophylactic dexamethasone or steroid strategy where a patient may get dexamethasone for around three days until the lymphocyte counts start to drop. And we saw in that cohort that it didn’t reduce the incidence of Parkinsonism. And we still had patients with quite severe manifestation, including some patients who have died from the complications of either Parkinsonism or treatment. So at ASH 2026, we present our most recent experience where we changed from using dexamethasone to cyclophosphamide. So we were giving a one-time dose, 500 milligram, similar to the dose that we would normally give for a weekly Cytoxan D, but just one time when the patient’s lymphocyte count gets at or above three, so above the normal threshold. Unfortunately, what we’ve seen with close to 56 patients treated with this strategy is that we’re not seeing a reduction in the incidence of Parkinsonism. However, we are seeing that these patients are presenting with much milder symptoms, and many of them are either improving or have symptoms that are resolved at the time of presentation with relatively milder treatment. So it may be that there’s some qualitative improvement in the severity of the symptoms when they manifest with this approach. But it could also be there’s a factor of more education with the patient and caregivers so they’re coming back to us for evaluation earlier as well so the earlier intervention may be more effective.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Choose your cookie settings

VJHemOnc uses necessary cookies to make the site work. With your permission we'd also like to use analytics, preference and marketing cookies to understand how the site is used and improve it.

Choose an option to continue. You can change it at any time on our Cookie Policy page, linked at the bottom of every page.