Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Community Focus Channel is supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold).

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel is supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze).

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ASCO 2026 | The optimal frequency and timing of NGS testing in MPNs

Akriti Jain, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, discusses the optimal frequency and timing of mutational profiling with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), suggesting it should be performed more frequently to monitor clonal dynamics and guide treatment decisions. This interview took place during the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting in Chicago, IL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Yes, that’s a great question. I think as a field, we question this a lot. How often should we be doing next-generation sequencing for our patients? And next-generation sequencing is always performed at diagnosis and a lot of times at disease progression. So if someone has been responding to treatment and they either stop responding or the treatment is not working anymore, or if they were not transfusion-dependent and suddenly they start needing transfusions or their disease is progressing from the chronic phase of the disease of MPN to more of a blast phase or accelerated phase disease or from MDS to AML...

Yes, that’s a great question. I think as a field, we question this a lot. How often should we be doing next-generation sequencing for our patients? And next-generation sequencing is always performed at diagnosis and a lot of times at disease progression. So if someone has been responding to treatment and they either stop responding or the treatment is not working anymore, or if they were not transfusion-dependent and suddenly they start needing transfusions or their disease is progressing from the chronic phase of the disease of MPN to more of a blast phase or accelerated phase disease or from MDS to AML. So disease progression is when we perform the next-generation sequencing again. However, we’ve learned from precursor conditions like clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, where in some cases we might even be performing an NGS every year or every two years and applying that knowledge from precursor conditions. Although this still needs to be vetted further, my recommendation would be to do an NGS more often, whether yearly or every two years or even every three to five years, but to perform it in between as well, because unless we do an NGS, we won’t know how the clonal dynamics of the disease are changing over time. And given our study and multiple other studies that have shown that if there’s acquisition of new mutations, not just TP53, but other mutations like IDH1 and IDH2 can impact prognosis and can mean that the disease is being more aggressive and has potential for progression and can help guide decisions on treatment as well as allogeneic stem cell transplant.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...