Frailty assessment in the context of myeloma is very important because we need to provide individualized treatment decisions. So in the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, there is a wonderful frailty Index, which has been very well validated, which is the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index. Based on this index, we can actually identify three subpopulations: fit, frail, and intermediate...
Frailty assessment in the context of myeloma is very important because we need to provide individualized treatment decisions. So in the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, there is a wonderful frailty Index, which has been very well validated, which is the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index. Based on this index, we can actually identify three subpopulations: fit, frail, and intermediate. And we can provide tailored treatment based on this categorization. What we have done in this study is to actually see whether this prognostic index, this frailty index actually, might work also in the setting of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, and actually, it works very well. So, this is one of the very few pieces of evidence telling us that this frailty index also works in the setting of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. But on top of this, we have seen that if we had physical functioning at the baseline, so in conjunction with this frailty assessment, we can improve the accuracy of prediction of survival. So again, the message is that assessing physical fitness in this population might improve the accuracy of frailty assessment. So patient-reported outcomes, they provide, again, unique information that is not captured in the way we currently assess frailty in patients with myeloma.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.