DeRIVE was a study in which we were trying to understand where is ixazomib versus bortezomib could fit in the first four cycles of initial therapy. And part of what we were trying to understand was speed of response, and what we determined was that, for patients, the speed of response was quicker for the subcutaneous bortezomib than it was for the ixazomib. After four cycles of therapy, they then switched to ixazomib for all groups, and what we showed was that over time, particularly up to cycle eight, the responses continued to deepen...
DeRIVE was a study in which we were trying to understand where is ixazomib versus bortezomib could fit in the first four cycles of initial therapy. And part of what we were trying to understand was speed of response, and what we determined was that, for patients, the speed of response was quicker for the subcutaneous bortezomib than it was for the ixazomib. After four cycles of therapy, they then switched to ixazomib for all groups, and what we showed was that over time, particularly up to cycle eight, the responses continued to deepen. Several patients then went on to transplant as consolidation afterwards, and then received ixazomib and daratumumab as maintenance therapy. And what we found was that this treatment approach really did result in a very high percentage of patients achieving complete remission, many patients achieving MRD-negativity, and more importantly, this was very well tolerated with a defined period of treatment.