I think overall, B-ALL, a refrain I hear commonly is that this is becoming a more satisfying disease to treat, because when we meet a patient we know that we have better therapies for both first-line and relapse therapy than we did even just a few years ago and that we’re seeing presentations to suggest that we’re going to continue to see advances in the coming years...
I think overall, B-ALL, a refrain I hear commonly is that this is becoming a more satisfying disease to treat, because when we meet a patient we know that we have better therapies for both first-line and relapse therapy than we did even just a few years ago and that we’re seeing presentations to suggest that we’re going to continue to see advances in the coming years. It’s challenging because every couple of years the messaging for the patients is different, but that’s a good problem to have. I would say the theme of the abstracts this year’s ASH are increasing understanding about the best place for novel therapies, immunotherapies. Blinatumomab, inotuzumab originally approved for the relapsed setting, now increasingly incorporated in the frontline setting. And cellular therapy, such as CAR T-cells, approved for relapsed setting, being investigated in the frontline setting. So we’re trying to get better understanding of how to incorporate all of our available therapeutics to cure more patients. And when possible, de-escalate chemotherapy, appropriately restrict transplantation to those that need it. And so we’re getting incremental data every year about how different subgroups respond and how to best treat them.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.