Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | A subset analysis of DREAMM-8: outcomes for patients who received 1 prior LOT including lenalidomide

Meral Beksac, MD, Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, comments on the results of a subset analysis of the DREAMM-8 study (NCT04484623), which investigated the efficacy of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) versus bortezomib plus (Pd) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). The patients in this subset analysis had received one prior line of therapy (LOT), which included lenalidomide. Dr Beksac highlights that the belamaf combination demonstrated a significant impact on progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) rate, and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

This DREAMM-8 study has been now published in the New England Journal of Medicine and we are now presenting here early relapse patients who have received one line of therapy and most of these patients have been exposed to lenalidomide and the majority are also lenalidomide refractory which is an important feature for myeloma patients because myeloma patients are receiving lenalidomide maintenance almost for all of them and once they progress on lenalidomide these patients become candidates for a second line of therapy...

This DREAMM-8 study has been now published in the New England Journal of Medicine and we are now presenting here early relapse patients who have received one line of therapy and most of these patients have been exposed to lenalidomide and the majority are also lenalidomide refractory which is an important feature for myeloma patients because myeloma patients are receiving lenalidomide maintenance almost for all of them and once they progress on lenalidomide these patients become candidates for a second line of therapy. And here in this DREAMM-8 study there are some patients who have been meeting this criteria and here we are reporting the results. 

The combination of belantamab, which is an antibody drug conjugate, with pomalidomide and dexamethasone comparing with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, the difference in outcome has been shown earlier with a significant impact on progression-free survival. And this data is valid for patients who are receiving this combination after the first line and the differences are valid for in terms of PFS, in terms of depth of response almost doubling the CR rate and also MRD negativity. So measurable residual disease is like 33% among patients who have received belantamab versus those who did not receive which is like 5%. So the difference is really very big. 

And the major concern about the ocular toxicity of belantamab has been addressed in detail. And 92% of patients have reversible ocular toxicity. And this is a very important finding. And once we recognize these ocular toxicities, we stop or modify the dosing and increase the intervals. And what we have seen is increasing the intervals does not impair the response, and so the response is durable and the toxicity is manageable.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Other: advisory.