Zanubrutinib is a second generation covalent BTK inhibitor, and it was compared head-to-head with ibrutinib in the APLINE study. In the APLINE study, we found that there were lower rates of serious adverse events, lower rates of drug holds, drug discontinuation with zanubrutinib compared to ibrutinib as well as lower rates of permanent discontinuation with zanubrutinib. The rate of infections was fairly similar, and the rate of hypertension was fairly similar in ALPINE...
Zanubrutinib is a second generation covalent BTK inhibitor, and it was compared head-to-head with ibrutinib in the APLINE study. In the APLINE study, we found that there were lower rates of serious adverse events, lower rates of drug holds, drug discontinuation with zanubrutinib compared to ibrutinib as well as lower rates of permanent discontinuation with zanubrutinib. The rate of infections was fairly similar, and the rate of hypertension was fairly similar in ALPINE. Although when you look more broadly across the zanubrutinib experience, as we did for the poster here at EHA, you’ll see that hypertension is lower overall with zanubrutinib, that ALPINE is a bit of an outlier in that regard. And what we particularly saw in ALPINE, and also still see in the larger cohort, is that the risk of cardiac events is significantly lower with zanubrutinib compared to ibrutinib – fewer serious cardiac adverse events, fewer drug discontinuations and notably no cardiac deaths versus six with ibrutinib which was 2%.