Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

IMW 2021 | The future role of transplantation in myeloma

Maria-Victoria Mateos, MD, PhD, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain, talks on the role of transplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel therapies on the treatment landscape. Dr Mateos reports that transplantation remains as the standard of care and comments on the role of high-dose melphalan in improving response. Dr Mateos also talks on clinical trials where novel agents have demonstrated similar efficacies to transplantation, and how risk factors and measurable residual disease (MRD) are likely to take more prominent roles in the management of myeloma in the future. Dr Mateos shares her view that B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies may challenge the role of transplantation in the future. This interview took place during the 18th International Myeloma Workshop (IMW 2021) congress.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

This is a challenging question. And today, 2021, and transplant continues being the standard of care. Even after novel agents based combination, and we can talk about proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and even anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. And transplant is complimentary because high-dose melphalan that the disease is what it means, the autologous stem cell transplantation, is able to upgrade the quality of the response...

This is a challenging question. And today, 2021, and transplant continues being the standard of care. Even after novel agents based combination, and we can talk about proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and even anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. And transplant is complimentary because high-dose melphalan that the disease is what it means, the autologous stem cell transplantation, is able to upgrade the quality of the response.

However, it’s true that there are some clinical trials, in which to transplant resulted into a similar overall survival to non-transplant that like this is the case for a French study. These means that maybe we can incorporate the patient preferences when we have a newly diagnosed myeloma patient in front of us. Definitely today, it continues being a standard of care, but this is going to be challenged in the near future.

From my personal perspective, I think that we are going to incorporate risk factors as well as the minimal residual disease status after an optimal induction and maybe patients with our RISS-1 as well as minimal residual disease negative after an optimal induction and maybe theses patients should not need autologous stem cell transplantation. Definitely this is under investigation in Phase III clinical trials that are ongoing, and we will see what happens, but you have to know that the BCMA CAR-Ts are also going to maybe to challenge autologous system stem cell transplantation in Phase III clinical studies.

So, we will see what happens. Today, we continue offering transplant to our patients, and in the future, I think that we will not be able to offer transplant to all patients. Maybe only to those with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, we will see what happens.

Read more...

Disclosures

Maria-Victoria Mateos, MD, PhD, has received honoraria from lectures and participated in boards with Janssen, BMS-Celgene, AbbVie, Amgen, Takeda, GSK, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Adaptive, Roche, Bluebird-bio and Sea-Gen.