Cervosumab is a bispecific antibody targeting FcRH5, and we’re aware that expression is not altered by previous exposure to a BCMA-targeted therapy. This is very important because patients who are failing a BCMA CAR T-cell or, for example, belantamab mafodotin will retain FcRH5 expression and therefore could be candidates for cevostamab-based treatments. What we know from the CAMMA 1 clinical trial is that cevostamab plus pomalidomide is highly effective with high response rates and durable responses, as well as being a tolerable combination...
Cervosumab is a bispecific antibody targeting FcRH5, and we’re aware that expression is not altered by previous exposure to a BCMA-targeted therapy. This is very important because patients who are failing a BCMA CAR T-cell or, for example, belantamab mafodotin will retain FcRH5 expression and therefore could be candidates for cevostamab-based treatments. What we know from the CAMMA 1 clinical trial is that cevostamab plus pomalidomide is highly effective with high response rates and durable responses, as well as being a tolerable combination. And so we believe that cevostamab plus pomalidomide could well be an effective salvage therapy for patients who are failing either a BCMA CAR T-cell or a BCMA antibody drug conjugate. I would, however, be a little bit careful following a BCMA bispecific antibody because the CAMMA 1 study also demonstrated that the response rate for cevostamab following a BCMA bispecific was just 10%. Now, the reason for that is probably due to immune T-cell deregulation as opposed to target change. So really, the Cevopom combination is best being used post-Belantamab or BCMA CAR T-cells.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.