Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel is supported with funding from AbbVie (Platinum), Sanofi (Gold), Legend Biotech (Bronze), and through an educational grant from Alexion Pharma GmbH.

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

IMS 2026 | Phase III EXCALIBER-RRMM trial results: iberdomide plus daratumumab in R/R multiple myeloma

Sagar Lonial, MD, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, discusses efficacy and safety findings from the Phase III EXCALIBER-RRMM study (NCT04975997) evaluating iberdomide plus daratumumab versus daratumumab and bortezomib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma. He highlights a higher one-year measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate with iberdomide, alongside manageable neutropenia and lower rates of other IMiD-related toxicities. This interview took place at the 23rd International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting in Glasgow, UK.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

The EXCALIBER-RRMM study is a randomized Phase III trial evaluating iberdomide in combination with daratumumab versus daratumumab with bortezomib. And what we have demonstrated is that the MRD rate at one year is basically double, 40% versus only 20% for dara-Vd. And that in terms of safety, the one thing that is on target is neutropenia. And we see that, and it’s manageable from a clinical perspective...

The EXCALIBER-RRMM study is a randomized Phase III trial evaluating iberdomide in combination with daratumumab versus daratumumab with bortezomib. And what we have demonstrated is that the MRD rate at one year is basically double, 40% versus only 20% for dara-Vd. And that in terms of safety, the one thing that is on target is neutropenia. And we see that, and it’s manageable from a clinical perspective. But all of the other IMiD-related side effects, like fatigue and diarrhea, those are significantly lower than what we saw before. So not only is it more effective, it’s actually got a better safety profile.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...