I do think that bridging therapy is very important in terms of safely and effectively receiving CAR-T for our patients. As we move CAR-Ts in earlier lines of therapy, we generally have better bridging therapies because our patients are not as exposed to different agents. But then even you know in later lines there’s been some new data either from the German group with some bispecifics, a BCMA and GPRC5D bispecific, and then from the U...
I do think that bridging therapy is very important in terms of safely and effectively receiving CAR-T for our patients. As we move CAR-Ts in earlier lines of therapy, we generally have better bridging therapies because our patients are not as exposed to different agents. But then even you know in later lines there’s been some new data either from the German group with some bispecifics, a BCMA and GPRC5D bispecific, and then from the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium we’ve shown some data with talquetamab bridging in patients who were heavily pre-treated. Both studies look good in terms of outcomes, deepening of responses and on-target off-tumor toxicities generally resolvable and improved after a very short exposure to some of these agents by about a month or so. And there’s been KarMMa-3, CARTITUDE-2, both have subgroup analysis looking at outcomes by decrease in disease burden based on bridging therapy. And essentially what we see is that if we reduce the disease burden by 25% or higher by IMWG criteria, you see that those patients have significantly superior progression-free survival compared to those who had stable or no decrease in disease burden. So I do think overall optimal debulking will allow us to safely and effectively take our patient to CAR T-cell therapies.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.