We still have not only dual-targeted CARs, but we have some other exciting CARs and some data we’ve presented at ASH, particularly with anito-cel, which is still a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell product. The results are quite promising, and we don’t see these delayed neurologic toxicities that we’ve seen with the other BCMA products, particularly cilta-cel...
We still have not only dual-targeted CARs, but we have some other exciting CARs and some data we’ve presented at ASH, particularly with anito-cel, which is still a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell product. The results are quite promising, and we don’t see these delayed neurologic toxicities that we’ve seen with the other BCMA products, particularly cilta-cel. But then you’re right – what I’m really excited about is the dual-targeted approaches. We have CD19 and BCMA. We have GPRC5D as well as BCMA and actually the PI is at our site for that dual-targeted CAR. The results look very encouraging, and we hope that if you do develop resistance to one target, hopefully you can overcome that by utilizing a second novel target, such as GPRC5D. And we’ve hopefully limited on-target off-tumor toxicities that are easier to resolve than some of the, for example, talquetamab-based toxicities. So very exciting future in terms of these dual-targeted CARs.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.