Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

IMS 2024 | Controversies and unanswered questions in smoldering myeloma

Elena Zamagni, MD, PhD, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, discusses some controversial issues surrounding smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), including risk definition, patient involvement in clinical trials, and the goals of treatment. This interview took place at the 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I might say that the big takeaway is that it is a controversial issue. I think that all the speakers beautifully summarized this point, that we gained some success, but there is a lot of work to be done yet, currently ongoing, so many answers are not there. But I use the words of Vincent Rajkumar who said, anyway we have to make a point and to stay on what we have now so we cannot always going on saying “until” we will not reach the perfection, we are not doing anything...

I might say that the big takeaway is that it is a controversial issue. I think that all the speakers beautifully summarized this point, that we gained some success, but there is a lot of work to be done yet, currently ongoing, so many answers are not there. But I use the words of Vincent Rajkumar who said, anyway we have to make a point and to stay on what we have now so we cannot always going on saying “until” we will not reach the perfection, we are not doing anything. So the most controversial issue is the risk definition of smoldering multiple myeloma, the second point is what is happening to those patients after they have been treated for smoldering multiple myeloma – can they be included in clinical trials, yes, no? With which progression, biochemical or clinical progression? And of course the third controversial point is what is the goal of the treatment of smoldering multiple myeloma patients, whether it is to delay progression to active myeloma or to try to reach cure. This is again, another open question, so I think that all these points were touched and summarized, and of course there is still open questions ongoing but at least some of them were somehow agreed between the speakers.

Read more...