Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ASH 2022 | The safety and efficacy of itacitinib monotherapy for patients with low-risk GvHD

Aaron Etra, MD, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, discusses a study evaluating itacitinib monotherapy for the treatment of low-risk graft-versus-host disease (LR GvHD). Historically, GvHD has been treated with systemic corticosteroids (SCS), which can cause significant morbidities and increased risk of infection. Results demonstrated that itacitinib treatment was safer and more effective than treatment with SCS. This interview took place at the 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition congress in New Orleans, LA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

So, graft-versus-host disease is one of the principle complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, where a recipient having received a bone marrow transplant suffers from an immunologic injury from their donor’s cells. Historically, this treatment has been treated with systemic corticosteroids, a treatment which has significant morbidity. What the trial that I presented today aims to do is to replace systemic corticosteroids with a JAK1 inhibitor, itacitinib...

So, graft-versus-host disease is one of the principle complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, where a recipient having received a bone marrow transplant suffers from an immunologic injury from their donor’s cells. Historically, this treatment has been treated with systemic corticosteroids, a treatment which has significant morbidity. What the trial that I presented today aims to do is to replace systemic corticosteroids with a JAK1 inhibitor, itacitinib. This is true, in this study anyway, for a subset of patients, those who are Minnesota standard risk clinical criteria for low risk GvHD and Ann Arbor 1 GvHD, a biomarker risk classification scheme, so both clinical and biomarker risk scores together. So itacitinib was as effective as systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of low-risk GvHD, even in subsets of patients with extensive skin GvHD or lower GI GvHD, which is a big finding. In addition to that, itacitinib treated patients were less likely to experience significant infectious morbidity than patients receiving systemic corticosteroids, so itacitinib is both effective and safer than the status quo.

Read more...

Disclosures

Kadmon: Consultancy.