During this ASH meeting, I think there are two disappointments maybe. One is the PANTHER study, evaluating azacitidine plus pevonedistat versus azacitidine plus placebo in myelodysplastic syndromes. Unfortunately, this study failed its primary endpoint. So based on the Phase II study, we guessed this Phase III would be a positive, but it wasn’t the case. Today, azacitidine stays for the moment, the standard of care for myelodysplastic syndromes...
During this ASH meeting, I think there are two disappointments maybe. One is the PANTHER study, evaluating azacitidine plus pevonedistat versus azacitidine plus placebo in myelodysplastic syndromes. Unfortunately, this study failed its primary endpoint. So based on the Phase II study, we guessed this Phase III would be a positive, but it wasn’t the case. Today, azacitidine stays for the moment, the standard of care for myelodysplastic syndromes.
The secondary disappointment is the LACEWING study evaluating azacitidine plus gilteritinib in FLT3-mutated patients. This study failed to obtain the primary endpoint too.
Maybe the third highlight is the AGILE study in acute myeloid leukemia IDH1 mutated, evaluating azacitidine plus ivosidenib in first-line randomized with AZA alone. So this study is positive. We observed a significant increase of response and also a significant increase of overall survival. So I think maybe azacitidine plus ivosidenib could challenge azacitidine plus venetoclax in first line in the IDH1-mutated patient. So maybe there is something to evaluate in the future.