That’s a very important question, because when we look at the US, we see there that there is less genomic testing being done on our patients because the argument is, “Oh, I’m going to start a BTK inhibitor to my patient anyhow”.
I still would like to encourage all physicians to do genetic testing because it’s particularly important in young and fit patients because there, we know that even with the targeted agents, TP53 mutation or other genetic aberrations as IgHV status subtypes, for example, or maybe also as a SF3B1 mutation are predicting a shorter remission duration even to the targeted agents...
That’s a very important question, because when we look at the US, we see there that there is less genomic testing being done on our patients because the argument is, “Oh, I’m going to start a BTK inhibitor to my patient anyhow”.
I still would like to encourage all physicians to do genetic testing because it’s particularly important in young and fit patients because there, we know that even with the targeted agents, TP53 mutation or other genetic aberrations as IgHV status subtypes, for example, or maybe also as a SF3B1 mutation are predicting a shorter remission duration even to the targeted agents.
And therefore, it’s important that on the one hand, we follow those patients very closely, we consider inclusion in clinical trials where we may be able to offer even more combination therapies, being able to control this high-risk disease even better, or even still considering allogeneic stem cell transplantation or other cellular therapies, if available. Therefore, it’s still important. And even for elderly, less fit patients, this information with respect to the choice of treatment, if you would prefer time-limited treatment, where in my opinion, particularly in patients with favorable prognostic profile, benefit a lot in contrast to the continuous treatment will help in the treatment decision.