Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Non-Malignant Channel is supported with funding from Agios (Gold).

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ASH 2025 | Biomarkers in ITP: understanding a patient’s immune phenotype and guiding therapeutic selection

Hanny Al-Samkari, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, comments on the challenges of identifying biomarkers in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) to understand a patient’s underlying immune phenotype and guide therapeutic selection. Dr Al-Samkari notes that while some studies have shown potential correlations between certain biomarkers and treatment response, these findings are not yet widely applicable in clinical practice. This interview took place at the 67th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in Orlando, FL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Biomarkers have sort of been a very challenging area that have not led to much success in ITP in terms of helping us understand more about a patient’s specific underlying immune phenotype in ITP, whether they’re more platelet autoantibody focused in terms of their disease, more T-cell focused, right? We recognize that there are many different sort of underlying immune phenotypes that may respond better to certain therapies, but we don’t actually have a way right now of saying which patients are which in clinical practice...

Biomarkers have sort of been a very challenging area that have not led to much success in ITP in terms of helping us understand more about a patient’s specific underlying immune phenotype in ITP, whether they’re more platelet autoantibody focused in terms of their disease, more T-cell focused, right? We recognize that there are many different sort of underlying immune phenotypes that may respond better to certain therapies, but we don’t actually have a way right now of saying which patients are which in clinical practice. We did do a study a number of years ago that showed patients that have normal or only slightly elevated endogenous thrombopoietin levels did respond better to thrombopoietin receptor agonists. But again, most people are not going to be able or not going to want to check a thrombopoietin level necessarily before starting a patient on treatment because it’s a send-out test in most places. So we recognize that. So this is an area of ongoing investigation, and it’s an area of interest. But unfortunately, right now, it’s therapeutic selection based on shared decision-making, discussion with the patient, discussion about the mode of administration, how frequently the patient has to take the medicine, the potential side effects, and recognizing that there may be certain aspects of the patient, like, for example, if they have a strong thromboembolic history that might guide you toward one choice of medicine or another.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...