This goes back to the way that we should all select agents in ITP, which is shared decision-making with an understanding of the patient’s underlying comorbidities. So, you know, if somebody has ongoing comorbidities that are relevant to a certain drug, like, for example, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, then, you know some people would think twice before starting a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, particularly if they have a strong history of thrombosis...
This goes back to the way that we should all select agents in ITP, which is shared decision-making with an understanding of the patient’s underlying comorbidities. So, you know, if somebody has ongoing comorbidities that are relevant to a certain drug, like, for example, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, then, you know some people would think twice before starting a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, particularly if they have a strong history of thrombosis. Some patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome do just fine on a thrombopoietin receptor agonist. So I think that it’s always a measure of relative risk and benefit, and trying, obviously, to match up a drug’s potential, you know, trying to avoid a drug’s potential toxicity profile overlapping with what’s going on in that patient’s medical history as much as possible. But beyond that, you know, it’s a patient-by-patient, you know, art.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.