One of the main objectives or the main goals we have now is accessibility. So we have these very good treatments and these very good options, alternatives of combinations with immunotherapy, CAR-T, GPR, CD5, FcRH5. So all of this is very good. But we have to make them accessible. This on one side is approvals and reimbursement, but on the other one is once we have it, we have to use it. And we have to use that for all patients...
One of the main objectives or the main goals we have now is accessibility. So we have these very good treatments and these very good options, alternatives of combinations with immunotherapy, CAR-T, GPR, CD5, FcRH5. So all of this is very good. But we have to make them accessible. This on one side is approvals and reimbursement, but on the other one is once we have it, we have to use it. And we have to use that for all patients. Here, we don’t have such many problems. I think there are two different scenarios. One is that we use these drugs and that the patients are referred to the big centers to start. And I think this is a good possibility at the beginning, to start in the big center with experience, and then after the first cycles, then we can move that to their reference centers, which is more small community centers. And this could be at the beginning, just for the small centers to have experience. And then after that, after they have had some patients with this option, they can start treating their patients safely with that. But I think it’s very important to give information to these investigators, what are the main adverse events, how we manage them, what are the main prophylactic measures we have to use. With that, I think we will be very safe. And we know, we understand that we know that we are being much safer now than we were before, because we have learned how to use these novel approaches.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.