Yes, well, if you look at published data on the cost-effectiveness of CAR T-cells, you do find quite a diversity of results, for one good reason. I mean, indications are not the same from one CAR-T to another, and of course, you get more benefit when you’re treating children than when you’re treating adults. So, if you look at the results of the study, there’s one major issue, of course, is that there’s a lot of uncertainty on long-term benefits...
Yes, well, if you look at published data on the cost-effectiveness of CAR T-cells, you do find quite a diversity of results, for one good reason. I mean, indications are not the same from one CAR-T to another, and of course, you get more benefit when you’re treating children than when you’re treating adults. So, if you look at the results of the study, there’s one major issue, of course, is that there’s a lot of uncertainty on long-term benefits.
So, if you look at the extrapolation of clinical data over the lifetime of the patients, you do get substantial benefits in terms of lives saved and also lives saved adjusted to the quality of life.
So the cost-effectiveness ratio would range from, let’s say, €40,000 to €60,000 per QALY.
Now, if you consider that the uncertainty is very high, then you have much higher answers, around 150 to 200 [thousand] euros per QALY.
Now, of course, even €150,000 per QALY or €250,000 per QALY are in the ranges of the usual numbers you get when you look at recent oncology drugs.
But the interesting thing, of course, is that, in general, all these models do yield higher benefits in terms of saving lives and saving lives adjusted to quality of life. So this is where you find some sort of justification of a high price with a one-shot treatment, but which compensates other treatments that will last, I mean, during the whole life of the patient.
So today, the cost-effectiveness of CAR T-cells is not outside the range of what you see usually in cancer and it could be even lower. But that, of course, does not necessarily justify high prices.