Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

iwHRMM 2025 | The potential of CAR-T to improve the outcomes of patients with high-risk myeloma

Doris Hansen, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, discusses the differences in responses and survival outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with high-risk versus standard-risk multiple myeloma (MM). Dr Hansen notes that although patients with high-risk disease may have less durable responses, CAR T-cell therapies still offer improved outcomes compared to other treatment strategies. This interview took place at the 2nd International Workshop on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma (iwHRMM 2025), held in Charleston, SC.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

We’ve seen that even with CAR T-cell therapies, patients who have high-risk features such as high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, some of the other high-risk features like plasma cell leukemia, CNS involvement, we know that these patients generally, while they might respond, their responses are much less durable and their progression-free survival is significantly shorter...

We’ve seen that even with CAR T-cell therapies, patients who have high-risk features such as high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, some of the other high-risk features like plasma cell leukemia, CNS involvement, we know that these patients generally, while they might respond, their responses are much less durable and their progression-free survival is significantly shorter. Nonetheless, we do see that these responses are much better than what we’ve seen with some of the other agents. So CAR-T and even today in the meeting, we talked about RedirecTT-1, for example, with tal and teq, particularly in patients with extramedullary disease, those patients are actually getting a good response. 

Another very nice and elegant analysis is CARTITUDE-4, looking at patients with functional high-risk disease, which is really one of the highest risk, I would say, populations in terms of patients with multiple myeloma. What was impressive about that with cilta-cel is that, you know, if they had received at least one prior line of therapy and had standard or functional high-risk disease, they had durable responses and their 12-month progression-free survival was nearly identical. So certainly it’s promising. And then a subgroup analysis for CARTITUDE-4 at ASCO presented by Dr. Sadana did show that cilta-cel might potentially overcome some of these high-risk features. So results are encouraging, and certainly we have many more novel targets and immunotherapies in development that will be promising, hopefully, for our patients.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...