Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Community Focus Channel is supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold).

The Myelodysplastic Syndromes Channel is supported with funding from Geron (Silver).

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

EHA 2026 | Recent advances in frontline treatment approaches for patients with LR-MDS

Thomas Cluzeau, MD, PhD, Central University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France, discusses current frontline treatment approaches to optimize outcomes in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). Dr Cluzeau highlights the benefits of luspatercept, a TGF-β inhibitor, which has been observed to have favorable outcomes compared with erythropoietin-stimulating agents. This interview took place at the 31st Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Stockholm, Sweden.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I presented also in the MDS session about the first-line treatment in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and today we have a chance to have other treatments. Before we had only erythropoietin-stimulating agents but now there is a TGF beta inhibitor, the luspatercept. There was a big phase three clinical trial comparing luspatercept versus EPO. And today we have a long-term follow-up from this study...

I presented also in the MDS session about the first-line treatment in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and today we have a chance to have other treatments. Before we had only erythropoietin-stimulating agents but now there is a TGF beta inhibitor, the luspatercept. There was a big phase three clinical trial comparing luspatercept versus EPO. And today we have a long-term follow-up from this study. And with the long-term follow-up, what we observe, we observe that there is a benefit for luspatercept in all subgroups, independently of the EPO level at baseline, independently of the RS status, there is a benefit for the RS negative and also for the RS positive patient, independently also of the transfusion burden at baseline. So this is a very important point. So the luspatercept induced more responses in all the subgroups. And now we have also the median duration of response. And the median duration of response is significantly better in the luspatercept arm. And the study was not designed to explore the overall survival but now we have more than three years of follow-up and we observe a trend to have a benefit also in overall survival in the luspatercept arm. So this is a very important point because today we have the data from the COMMANDS clinical trial but we have also data from the real-life and we have data from the European real-life setting and we have also the data from the US real-life setting and all the data confirm the result from COMMANDS so it’s good. We have a new treatment in the low-risk MDS and it’s better for the patient. presented also in the MDS session about the first-line treatment in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and today we have a chance to have other treatments. Before we had only erythropoietin-stimulating agents but now there is a TGF beta inhibitor, the luspatercept. There was a big phase three clinical trial comparing luspatercept versus EPO. And today we have a long-term follow-up from this study. And with the long-term follow-up, what we observe, we observe that there is a benefit for luspatercept in all subgroups, independently of the EPO level at baseline, independently of the RS status, there is a benefit for the RS negative and also for the RS positive patient, independently also of the transfusion burden at baseline. So this is a very important point. So the luspatercept induced more responses in all the subgroups. And now we have also the median duration of response. And the median duration of response is significantly better in the luspatercept arm. And the study was not designed to explore the overall survival but now we have more than three years of follow-up and we observe a trend to have a benefit also in overall survival in the luspatercept arm. So this is a very important point because today we have the data from the COMMANDS clinical trial but we have also data from the real-life and we have data from the European real-life setting and we have also the data from the US real-life setting and all the data confirm the result from COMMANDS so it’s good. We have a new treatment in the low-risk MDS and it’s better for the patient.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...