Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Amyloidosis Channel is supported through an educational grant from Alexion Pharma GmbH.

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ESC 2026 | Heterogeneity in cardiac amyloidosis care across Europe: insights from a KOL survey

Luuk Kieviet, MD, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, discusses preliminary findings from a key opinion leader (KOL) survey evaluating heterogeneity in cardiac amyloidosis care across Europe. Dr Kieviet highlights variations in the availability of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) treatment centers and time to treatment initiation across European regions. Dr Kieviet also discusses plans for further investigation to better understand and address these disparities. This interview took place during the 2026 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress in Munich, Germany.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

This is the question we want to answer, of course, and it’s important to let you know that these results are only preliminary. So I’ve had a look into all the answers that the survey, what the cardiologists, the key opinion leaders, they answered, and that’s what I have looked into to make this abstract, of course. But we have to do further evaluation. I’ll just elaborate a little bit on this because it’s very important that we are now currently actually making pathways on how the cardiac amyloidosis patients are treated and we still have to validate those pathways and we are going to do that with cardiologists, ask them if they agree or not and if there’s any well-known centers or cardiologists who really answer differently than them we also have to look into those but so that’s important to let you know...

This is the question we want to answer, of course, and it’s important to let you know that these results are only preliminary. So I’ve had a look into all the answers that the survey, what the cardiologists, the key opinion leaders, they answered, and that’s what I have looked into to make this abstract, of course. But we have to do further evaluation. I’ll just elaborate a little bit on this because it’s very important that we are now currently actually making pathways on how the cardiac amyloidosis patients are treated and we still have to validate those pathways and we are going to do that with cardiologists, ask them if they agree or not and if there’s any well-known centers or cardiologists who really answer differently than them we also have to look into those but so that’s important to let you know. But about the question you asked, there are quite a lot of differences, so in my talk what I found that there is a few centers in each country that can treat ATTR cardiomyopathy and there’s a lot of difference between countries in Europe. And for instance in the southern part of Europe they stated, because I didn’t check it but they that’s how they replied, that there sometimes are up to 11 or 20 centers in one country who can treat their ATTR cardiomyopathy. In other countries, for instance, there’s only one center. So those are really, really big differences, but we really did not look into what was the reason for it, or are they all really treating centers, or is it just follow-up or so. So that’s what we still have to do but this just gives like a highlight or something we should focus on. So that’s one part another part that’s interesting is the time it took to start treatment so that’s the other part I looked into and there’s differences in that. So in the western part of Europe, in the northern part as well, time to disease treatment initiation is way shorter than it is in, for instance, Eastern Europe. And I also don’t really know why that is yet, but maybe there are rules, maybe there are things they have to do first after they diagnose the patient and then they can treat it. So there are some really interesting things and this is only like a very small part of the survey. So we have a lot more going on as well, but we still really have to evaluate it.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...