The key priorities are that we all are, or we made these surveys using ESC guidelines. So we use all the knowledge we have right now to identify and diagnose these patients and still, there are the differences and we want to know why, because the cardiologists say that in up to 90% they use these guidelines, so you should have the same time, and then we need to know what the differences in, maybe it’s infrastructure, maybe it’s money, because that will be another analysis that will be done as well...
The key priorities are that we all are, or we made these surveys using ESC guidelines. So we use all the knowledge we have right now to identify and diagnose these patients and still, there are the differences and we want to know why, because the cardiologists say that in up to 90% they use these guidelines, so you should have the same time, and then we need to know what the differences in, maybe it’s infrastructure, maybe it’s money, because that will be another analysis that will be done as well. So those are priorities because I think, and I think we all want this, that all patients in Europe should have the same options, actually. And not that, and mainly in Western Europe, you have an easier treatment path than in Eastern Europe, for instance. So we really want to have this equal in the whole of Europe. And I think that is really the key thing about this whole survey, but this whole study we’re doing. This is not only to improve for cardiac amyloidosis. This is really for the patients to help them get diagnosed earlier, to get treatment earlier, and to improve survival, quality of life, things like that. So in the end, it’s all for patient care, of course, and we’re really trying to put it into a path to visualize how treatment is now done, how diagnosis is done. And in that way, we hope that we can really make it equal for all countries in Europe.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.