Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Real-world effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

Elizabeth O’Donnell, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, comments on the real-world effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in reducing the risk of infection in patients with multiple myeloma. She highlights that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly reduces the risk of severe infections and hypogammaglobulinemia. This finding is particularly important given the increasing use of therapies like CAR T-cell and bispecific T-cell engagers, which further reduce gamma globulin production and increase the risk of infection. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

So one of the most common problems that we encounter in the treatment of myeloma is the risk of infection. And it really derives from two things. One, patients with myeloma are inherently at risk of infection. As you see clonal expansion, you see a decrease in the number of polyclonal normal immunoglobulins and immunoparesis. In addition, many of our therapies also cause further reduction of our total globulins, which are part of our antibody-mediated infection-fighting capabilities...

So one of the most common problems that we encounter in the treatment of myeloma is the risk of infection. And it really derives from two things. One, patients with myeloma are inherently at risk of infection. As you see clonal expansion, you see a decrease in the number of polyclonal normal immunoglobulins and immunoparesis. In addition, many of our therapies also cause further reduction of our total globulins, which are part of our antibody-mediated infection-fighting capabilities. And so what we’ve done in the past couple of years in an ad hoc fashion is we’ve treated patients with immunoglobulin replacement therapy, specifically intravenous immunoglobulin G, IVIG, as a way to combat some of the hypogammaglobulinemia that we see. So what we did in our study is we did a retrospective longitudinal observational study of the patients seen through MGB in our research patient data repository, which is kind of a data vault that we’re able to do different research projects from. And we identified about over 6,000 patients with multiple myeloma who had had immunoglobulin data measured and as well had identified a cohort of about 7% of those patients who had received IVIG at some point over the course of their therapy. And what the really important finding was, so we set a threshold of hypogammaglobulinemia of 500 milligrams per deciliter. And we identified patients who had received IVIG. And what we showed in terms of the risk of infection, particularly severe infections and antimicrobial use, were significantly reduced with the introduction of IVIG. And in addition to that, when patients do receive IVIG, they have not surprisingly significantly less hypogammaglobulinemia. And so I think this is particularly important now as we have therapies like CAR T-cell and bispecific T-cell engagers that cause even greater reductions in the gamma globulin production. And we know that these patients have significantly increased risk of infection compared to even prior. So it’s really nice to have something that supports what we’re doing in clinical practice.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Natera: Other: Steering committee; Exact Sciences: Consultancy.