Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

CAR-T Meeting 2024 | Overcoming challenges in CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma

Mohamad Mohty, MD, PhD, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France, expresses optimism regarding current immunotherapeutic options in multiple myeloma (MM), such as CAR T-cells and bispecific antibodies. Prof. Mohty highlights the approved CAR-T therapies, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), with the primary challenge being enhancing long-term progression-free survival (PFS) in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. When manufacturing CAR T-cells, factors such as the target T-cell population, construct design, tumor antigen, and the potential of dual targeting should be considered to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes. Despite the challenges, CAR-T therapy offers the advantage of a single infusion, reducing the treatment burden for patients. This interview took place at the EBMT-EHA 6th European CAR T-cell Meeting in Valencia, Spain.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

Immunotherapy is really the key and most exciting advance we’ve seen recently in the field of multiple myeloma, and this is about T-cell redirecting therapies. And in order to achieve this goal and harness the immune system and engineer or, I would say use, the T-cells to fight against myeloma. 

Today, the most popular ways are either cellular therapy using CAR T-cells or using the bispecific antibodies...

Immunotherapy is really the key and most exciting advance we’ve seen recently in the field of multiple myeloma, and this is about T-cell redirecting therapies. And in order to achieve this goal and harness the immune system and engineer or, I would say use, the T-cells to fight against myeloma. 

Today, the most popular ways are either cellular therapy using CAR T-cells or using the bispecific antibodies. And obviously, when it comes to bispecific antibodies, there is a variety of tumor antigens like BCMA, and some bispecific antibodies are already available, approved and widely used. You have also abispecific antibodies against GPRC5D, but also FcRH5.

When it comes to CAR T-cells, obviously there are so many constructs. Two of them are already approved ide-cel and cilta-cel. Of course, the most challenging part of the story, especially because today the largest experience is in the relapsed/refractory, highly advanced multiple myeloma population, is how to achieve long term progression-free survival. And it doesn’t look like in multiple myeloma, in contrast to non-Hodgkin lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia, that we are getting a sort of a plateau when using CAR T-cells for relapsed/refractory disease. 

Having said this, I think we need to acknowledge some subtle differences between the results with ide-cel, for instance, which is a different construct from cilta-cel. The result of cilta-cel, although it may not be easy to compare across trials, the results of cilta-cel are proving probably to be better in terms of outcome.

So clearly, today, when we look to the use of CAR T-cells in this relapsed/refractory disease landscape, the question is about how can we further improve on the current result? Is it by having or using a different T-cell population? Is it about the construct itself? Or is it about the tumor antigen or maybe we should use a dual targeting?

So there are plenty of exciting questions, but I believe that today, with the results we have with the two available constructs ide-cel and cilta-cel, this is proving to be extremely helpful to many patients with otherwise no available solutions. In addition, and I believe this is important and I would like to emphasize it, that one key benefit of using CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma is about the single-shot therapy and the treatment-free interval that will follow. And this is huge, tremendous in terms of quality of life and I’ve never met a single patient who didn’t like the treatment-free interval period.

Read more...

Disclosures

Gilead: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Pfizer; Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.