Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ICML 2025 | ReVenG trial: safety & efficacy of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab retreatment in patients with R/R CLL

In this video, Matthew Davids, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, shares insights into the ReVenG trial (NCT04895436), which is evaluating the efficacy of venetoclax retreatment in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who previously received this agent in the frontline setting. Dr Davids presents early data from the trial, which shows promising efficacy and a similar safety profile to the frontline setting, with 15 out of 25 patients responding to retreatment and achieving undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in many cases. This interview took place during the 18th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (18-ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So venetoclax has become one of the mainstays of therapy in CLL and particularly in the front-line setting we use it in combination with obinutuzumab, the so-called ven-obin regimen, which is a one-year fixed duration treatment that can provide durable benefit for a lot of patients. But a major unanswered question in the field is how effective would venetoclax treatment be in a retreatment setting in those patients who previously received it in the frontline setting? We’re starting to see more and more of these patients in clinical practice now that the regimen has been available for a few years and so we’re studying these patients in a prospective trial called ReVenG and that stands for retreatment with VEN-G, which was the old name for obinutuzumab and so what we’re doing is we’re taking patients who had at least one year of remission from initial venetoclax and we’re retreating them with venetoclax obinutuzumab again if they had at least two years of remission from their frontline venetoclax, they just get one year of venetoclax retreatment...

So venetoclax has become one of the mainstays of therapy in CLL and particularly in the front-line setting we use it in combination with obinutuzumab, the so-called ven-obin regimen, which is a one-year fixed duration treatment that can provide durable benefit for a lot of patients. But a major unanswered question in the field is how effective would venetoclax treatment be in a retreatment setting in those patients who previously received it in the frontline setting? We’re starting to see more and more of these patients in clinical practice now that the regimen has been available for a few years and so we’re studying these patients in a prospective trial called ReVenG and that stands for retreatment with VEN-G, which was the old name for obinutuzumab and so what we’re doing is we’re taking patients who had at least one year of remission from initial venetoclax and we’re retreating them with venetoclax obinutuzumab again if they had at least two years of remission from their frontline venetoclax, they just get one year of venetoclax retreatment. And if they only had one to two years of initial remission, then they get either 18 or 24 months of retreatment. And at this meeting, we presented some early data from the study. We have 25 patients recruited so far. I would say overall, the safety profile looks quite similar to what we see in the frontline setting with some grade three, four neutropenia and gastrointestinal side effects that are mild, but nothing out of line with what we expect from venetoclax. And the early efficacy data look promising. We have 15 patients who have reached the response evaluation time point of end of combination treatment plus three months, and all 15 patients have responded. Many of these patients have also achieved undetectable MRD, including six patients who achieved undetectable MRD at a threshold of 10 to the minus 6, suggesting a very deep response even at this very early response evaluation. I’d like to highlight that this study is ongoing and we’re actively accruing new patients with the goal of achieving a 75 patient sample size. So if you do have access to this study in your country, I’d highly recommend referring your patients.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...