Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASCO 2025 | Topline results from the SURPASS-ET trial: ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus anagrelide in ET

Lucia Masarova, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, discusses the topline results of the Phase III SURPASS-ET (NCT04285086) trial, highlighting the superiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b over anagrelide in controlling disease parameters in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have relapsed following frontline treatment with hydroxyurea. Dr Masarova notes that ropeginterferon alfa-2b demonstrated a significant advantage over anagrelide in all primary and secondary endpoints, including a doubling of the rate of complete hematologic remission. This interview took place at the 30th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Milan, Italy.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So there was a Phase III study comparing a novel interferon called ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with refractory ET comparing it to anagrelide. So patients that would fail hydroxyurea as a frontline approach, needed therapies, were randomized to either ropeginterferon alfa-2b or anagrelide. Top line results basically showed superiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b for second line ET patients in every single primary and secondary endpoint...

So there was a Phase III study comparing a novel interferon called ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with refractory ET comparing it to anagrelide. So patients that would fail hydroxyurea as a frontline approach, needed therapies, were randomized to either ropeginterferon alfa-2b or anagrelide. Top line results basically showed superiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b for second line ET patients in every single primary and secondary endpoint. 

So the primary endpoints was control of the disease as a combined hematologic control, so complete hematologic remission, and no enlargement or progression of the spleen as well as symptoms. That was achieved much higher in patients with ropeginterferon alfa-2b than anagrelide, actually the rates were doubled, about 70 percent about 30 percent in anagrelide patients. 

Then in subpopulations or sub endpoints where we looked at the control of all other significant parameters so white cell, platelet, symptoms, spleen, the ropeginterferon alfa-2b delivered superior data. Excitingly, also in control of the mutations so JAK2 mutations as well as CALR mutations were decreased more with ropeginterferon alfa-2b and actually they were not decreased with anagrelide because the drug would not do it. And then also a nice control seen of vascular adverse events as well as myelofibrosis progression. So the top line results so far very positive, very superior for comparing a second line option for patients with essential thrombocythemia, they will either be receiving ropeginterferon alfa-2b or anagrelide.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...