Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel is supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ASH 2025 | The COSI trial: addition of thiotepa to improve outcomes in patients with AML undergoing alloSCT

Charles Craddock, CBE, FRCP(UK), FRCPath, DPhil, FMedSci, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, discusses the COSI trial (ERN_17-1572), which investigated the addition of thiotepa to improve outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplasia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Prof. Craddock notes that while the trial did not show a beneficial impact on disease-free survival or overall survival, it did reveal a significant reduction in relapse risk in specific patients. This interview took place at the 67th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in Orlando, FL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Yes, the COSI trial was delivered by the UK Transplant Trial Network, IMPACT, and it looked at the really important question about whether by adding an additional cytotoxic drug, in this case, thiotepa, we could improve outcomes for patients allografted for AML in CR1 using either a myeloablative or reduced intensity transplant. And the take-home message was that in both the myeloablative and the reduced intensity setting, if you look at all comers, there was no beneficial impact on disease-free survival or overall survival...

Yes, the COSI trial was delivered by the UK Transplant Trial Network, IMPACT, and it looked at the really important question about whether by adding an additional cytotoxic drug, in this case, thiotepa, we could improve outcomes for patients allografted for AML in CR1 using either a myeloablative or reduced intensity transplant. And the take-home message was that in both the myeloablative and the reduced intensity setting, if you look at all comers, there was no beneficial impact on disease-free survival or overall survival. And the reason for that was, although there was a significant reduction in relapse, in the whole population, there was a marked uptick in transplant-related mortality. So I don’t think we would say that this is a new standard of care. But what is very interesting is that in patients with pre-transplant MRD positivity, there was a particularly marked reduction in relapse risk. This was to some extent offset by the increased transplant-related mortality. So I think the opportunity going forward is to design transplant regimens, including thiotepa, which have acceptable toxicity, but plausibly this is an agent that we can be applying to patients who have evidence of pre-transplant MRD positivity.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...