Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2025 | Final analysis of GAIA/CLL13: second-line treatment in CLL after venetoclax-based frontline

Barbara Eichhorst, MD, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany, discusses the final analysis of the GAIA/CLL13 trial (NCT02950051), focusing on the efficacy of second-line treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) after venetoclax-based first-line treatment. Dr Eichhorst highlights that these data are informative for patients seeking information on treatment options after frontline therapy and suggests that similar regimens can be used again in relapse situations. This interview took place at the 67th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in Orlando, FL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So we present here the final analysis of the GAIA trial with a special aspect of the study, namely relapse treatment after patients received either venetoclax plus rituximab or venetoclax plus obinutuzumab or a triple combination of venetoclax, obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy. And what we looked at is how was the time then to the next treatment, from the next treatment, so time to third-line treatment, from second-line treatment starting, because we didn’t collect response data, progression-free survival data, but when we look at then the time to the next treatment, we see that using again targeted treatments and these were venetoclax plus CD20 antibody or continuous treatment with BTKi or also venetoclax plus BTKi as a time-limited treatment they all work very well in patients...

So we present here the final analysis of the GAIA trial with a special aspect of the study, namely relapse treatment after patients received either venetoclax plus rituximab or venetoclax plus obinutuzumab or a triple combination of venetoclax, obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy. And what we looked at is how was the time then to the next treatment, from the next treatment, so time to third-line treatment, from second-line treatment starting, because we didn’t collect response data, progression-free survival data, but when we look at then the time to the next treatment, we see that using again targeted treatments and these were venetoclax plus CD20 antibody or continuous treatment with BTKi or also venetoclax plus BTKi as a time-limited treatment they all work very well in patients. The only patients who had a really poor outcome were those who received in second-line treatment chemoimmunotherapy. And these data, I think, they are very informative for patients asking already about their other treatment options after frontline. And what the data are confirming is that we probably can use similar regimens again. Unfortunately, so far, the only time-limited regimen approved in relapse CLL is venetoclax plus rituximab, but there is access to clinical trials or other options to use time-limited treatments. Again, in relapse situations, they can be used.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...