Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | MajesTEC-5: Phase II study of Tec-based induction in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma

Marc Raab, MD, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, comments on the results of the MajesTEC-5 trial (NCT05695508), a Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of teclistamab (Tec)-based induction regimens in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Prof. Raab highlights that the trial showed an encouraging response rate, with most patients achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity after only three cycles and all patients treated achieving MRD-negative complete remission (CR) at the end of induction. Despite these promising findings, Prof. Raab emphasizes the importance of stringent prophylactic measures to manage the risk of infection associated with this therapeutic approach. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

The GMMG-HD10/DSMM-XX MajesTEC-5, which is the full name, to acknowledge all the study groups involved, is a Phase II trial, as you said, that evaluates for the first time actually a bi-specific, a BCMA-directed bi-specific, in this case, teclistamab, in combination with standard of care in transplant-eligible patients. And we presented here the first data on the induction therapy, which consists of six cycles, a combination TEC plus Dara-Rd or TEC plus Dara-VRd, three cohorts...

The GMMG-HD10/DSMM-XX MajesTEC-5, which is the full name, to acknowledge all the study groups involved, is a Phase II trial, as you said, that evaluates for the first time actually a bi-specific, a BCMA-directed bi-specific, in this case, teclistamab, in combination with standard of care in transplant-eligible patients. And we presented here the first data on the induction therapy, which consists of six cycles, a combination TEC plus Dara-Rd or TEC plus Dara-VRd, three cohorts. One cohort had a weekly teclistamab dosing. The other two were four weekly teclistamab dosing. And out of the four weekly ones, there was one with Dara-Rd and one with Dara-VRd. So that’s basically the treatment lineup. 

And so what we found is that it is very efficacious. So it’s really, really active. We found not only a really high response rate, but we saw that all patients already after three cycles, so half of the induction therapy, achieved a MRD negativity, at least for those where we had samples, which was almost all patients so I think the two samples or three samples left missing out of 49 patients so the MRD negativity was really high all of the measured ones technically probably 96 92 percent around and with the first cohort having the longest follow-up we also saw that after six cycles so where all patients already had finished the six cycle induction therapy that all of these patients in the first cohort actually achieved a MRD negative CR at end of induction. So this is I think something to build on of course. 

But if you talk about BCMA and bispecifics of course, especially in combination, you have to look at the side effects, the adverse events, especially infections and so what we saw with a, I have to say quite stringent prophylactic measures set in place, like immune globulin replacement IVIgs as well as prophylactic antibiotics and antivirals we saw that overall so far we had a 30 34 35 percent rate of infections grade three and four, no grade five thankfully, all resolved. But of course it has to be taken with caution and also in terms of dose delays in terms of if a patient sees some you know sign shows some signs of infection and having this, so certainly if you have an experienced myeloma center it was very well manageable as we say, but of course you need to keep in mind that it is not just Dara-Rd right but it’s very very effective and this is certainly something that has not been seen before in this extent in this patient population after three cycles already.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

BMS, Janssen, Heidelberg Pharma: Research Funding; Heidelberg University Hospital Medical Clinic V, Multiple Myeloma: Current Employment; BMS, AMGEN, GSK, Janssen, SANOFI, PFIZER, AbbVie, Oncopeptides, Takeda: Consultancy; BMS, AMGEN, GSK, Janssen, SANOFI, PFIZER, AbbVie, Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Janssen, AMGEN, BMS, Sanofi, AbbVie, GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS, AMGEN, Janssen, Sanofi, AbbVie, Oncopeptides: Other: Travel.