Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

COMy 2025 | The incidence of de novo and secondary EMD in patients with multiple myeloma

In this video, Saurabh Zanwar, MD, MBBS, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, comments on the incidence of extramedullary disease (EMD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Although EMD can develop de novo at diagnosis, the incidence is significantly higher in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Dr Zanwar also highlights that certain genetic abnormalities, such as 1q gain or amplification and t(4;14) translocation, are associated with a higher risk of developing secondary EMD. This interview took place at the 11th World Congress on Controversies in Multiple Myeloma (COMy) congress in Paris, France.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Extramedullary disease can develop de novo, that is at diagnosis before any therapy, and the rate for that is somewhere around the 3 to 5 percent range from previous clinical trial studies and our own data that has looked at this question. What is more challenging is the higher incidence that we are seeing in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory patients. Some of the recent registrational studies are up to 25 to 30 percent patients having secondary extramedullary disease...

Extramedullary disease can develop de novo, that is at diagnosis before any therapy, and the rate for that is somewhere around the 3 to 5 percent range from previous clinical trial studies and our own data that has looked at this question. What is more challenging is the higher incidence that we are seeing in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory patients. Some of the recent registrational studies are up to 25 to 30 percent patients having secondary extramedullary disease. 

It’s also important to note that extramedullary disease is distinct from paraskeletal disease, which is basically a tumor tissue that’s originating from a break in the cortex of the bone, and these tend to be biologically different. So defining the incidence of true extramedullary disease is crucial, but we anticipate that around 25 to 30 percent of heavily pre-treated patients end up having secondary extramedullary disease. 

What we have previously noted is that from a matched cohort study, patients who have a 1q gain or amplification at diagnosis or a t(4;14) translocation tend to have a higher risk for secondary extramedullary disease. There have been no clearly defined risk factors for de novo extramedullary disease just because it’s a little tougher to study that population because of the smaller numbers, but I would guess that 1q amplifications and t(4;14) translocation seem to be the most prominent risk factors.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...