Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | MRD negativity in the CARTITUDE-4 trial: cilta-cel vs SoC in lenalidomide-refractory myeloma

Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD, University College London Hospitals, London, UK, comments on the Phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827), highlighting that ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) has shown a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rates compared to standard of care (SoC) in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. Dr Popat notes that cilta-cel demonstrated a three-fold increase in MRD negativity rates, particularly at the 10^-6 level, and that patients who achieved MRD negativity at this level also showed sustained MRD negativity. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI generated)

CARTITUDE-4 was a Phase III clinical trial evaluating the role of cilta-cel, which is a BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell versus standard of care options which were daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone or pomalidomide, Velcade, dexamethasone. We previously demonstrated that cilta-cel demonstrated a significant improvement in both progression-free survival and indeed overall survival and is the only myeloma CAR T-cell so far that has shown this improvement in overall survival...

CARTITUDE-4 was a Phase III clinical trial evaluating the role of cilta-cel, which is a BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell versus standard of care options which were daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone or pomalidomide, Velcade, dexamethasone. We previously demonstrated that cilta-cel demonstrated a significant improvement in both progression-free survival and indeed overall survival and is the only myeloma CAR T-cell so far that has shown this improvement in overall survival. What we’re showing here are the MRD negativity rates for this study. What we demonstrate is that patients were more likely to achieve MRD negativity overall with cilta-cel compared to standard of care and this is approximately a three-fold increase in MRD negativity. But what was very interesting was that when you look at the 10 to the minus 6 level which is much more deeper than the 10 to the minus 5 standard level, almost all the patients who achieved MRD negativity for cilta-cel at 10 to the minus 5 also achieved it at 10 to the minus 6. However, when you look at the standard of care arm, very few patients achieved MRD negativity at 10 to the minus 6. Now, when we also look at the attainment of MRD negative CR rates, then again, more patients achieved MRD negativity CR for cilta-cel compared to standard of care. And then if we go on and look at the achievement of sustained MRD negativity, which is achieving MRD negative results for two occasions at least more than 12 months apart, you’re more likely to achieve that with cilta-cel compared to standard of care. And then that correlates with an improvement in both progression-free survival and indeed overall survival. And then finally, we looked at some biological correlates, and you find that the patients who are more likely to achieve MRD negative CR were those patients who had a lower inflammatory phenotype, who had a better T-cell phenotype at the time of apheresis. We also saw higher T-cell expansion and we didn’t see a negative impact on soluble BCMA. So overall when you put all this together this supports the use of cilta-cel at early relapse where we have higher levels of deep MRD negativity which corresponds to the improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.