Nowadays in myeloma there is an emerging interest in liquid biopsies, circulating tumor cells, and I think it makes a lot of sense if we focus on the circulating tumor cell, to not only quantify it, for example using flow cytometry, but also to characterize its genomics. Because we know that over time, and I’m thinking mainly in patients with precursor conditions, we know that over time there will be evolving patterns of either stability or increased numbers as well as increased genomic complexity that may be associated with progression to active myeloma...
Nowadays in myeloma there is an emerging interest in liquid biopsies, circulating tumor cells, and I think it makes a lot of sense if we focus on the circulating tumor cell, to not only quantify it, for example using flow cytometry, but also to characterize its genomics. Because we know that over time, and I’m thinking mainly in patients with precursor conditions, we know that over time there will be evolving patterns of either stability or increased numbers as well as increased genomic complexity that may be associated with progression to active myeloma. So I think that the possibility of having new methods that not only quantify tumor burden sequentially in the blood and thereby using minimally invasive samples, but also provides some insight into how the genomics of this patient are now and in six months’ time, if stable or by contrast there is the emergence of a new subclone. I think this is highly attractive and I’m sure this will improve our ability to predict the future.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.