This is an investigator-initiated clinical trial looking at a primary endpoint of quality of life between two maintenance strategies, daratumumab versus lenalidomide. It’s a 100 patient study with 50 patients to be enrolled in each arm. Currently, the study is about 85% enrolled and we present interim efficacy analysis. So that’s a secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint of quality of life we are not presenting at ASH at this time...
This is an investigator-initiated clinical trial looking at a primary endpoint of quality of life between two maintenance strategies, daratumumab versus lenalidomide. It’s a 100 patient study with 50 patients to be enrolled in each arm. Currently, the study is about 85% enrolled and we present interim efficacy analysis. So that’s a secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint of quality of life we are not presenting at ASH at this time.
In terms of the secondary endpoint, what we do see is that both arms have single agent daratumumab and single agent lenalidomide given after induction and transplant as maintenance, plus minus transplant, so whether they got a transplant or not, showed similar progression-free survival at one year and two years, and also MRD negativity rates, suggesting that daratumumab may be an effective maintenance strategy as well as a single agent in patients, especially that may have intolerance to revlamide or lenalidomide and side effects.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.