We know that with continuous BTK inhibitors, primarily with ibrutinib, but now much more data with the second-generation inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanabrutinib, even though they are fairly well tolerated, many patients will discontinue therapy at some point, either because of a toxicity or just because of fatigue of taking a drug for so long when they are in remission...
We know that with continuous BTK inhibitors, primarily with ibrutinib, but now much more data with the second-generation inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanabrutinib, even though they are fairly well tolerated, many patients will discontinue therapy at some point, either because of a toxicity or just because of fatigue of taking a drug for so long when they are in remission. In this study, we were interested in just using our own data from The Ohio State University to look at outcomes of patients who did discontinue ibrutinib or acalabrutinib due to toxicity. We found, as you might expect, that patients who had been on the drug longer experienced a longer remission duration when the drug was stopped. But we do see that there are many patients who can go over a year and sometimes with a median of two years before new treatment is needed or before progression is even noted. And I think that these data really give some more legitimacy to the practice of stopping a BTK inhibitor when somebody develops toxicity rather than immediately switching them to another therapy.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.