So the POLARIX study is presenting longer term follow up at this meeting. I think everybody has been waiting to see that. What we have known for some time is that with a short follow-up of two years that there’s an improvement in progression-free survival with the Pola-R-CHP regimen. Our goal of treatment in large cell lymphoma is really to try to cure patients, and so if we’re seeing that early on, I think the question has been, what is that going to look like at five years? And what we see is that we’ve maintained the same benefit that was present at the two-year follow-up...
So the POLARIX study is presenting longer term follow up at this meeting. I think everybody has been waiting to see that. What we have known for some time is that with a short follow-up of two years that there’s an improvement in progression-free survival with the Pola-R-CHP regimen. Our goal of treatment in large cell lymphoma is really to try to cure patients, and so if we’re seeing that early on, I think the question has been, what is that going to look like at five years? And what we see is that we’ve maintained the same benefit that was present at the two-year follow-up. A lot of questions around overall survival had been raised previously. What we see is there isn’t an overall survival difference. I think that that may reflect the kind of growing number of tools that are available for patients who relapse. So it may be hard to show in an era where we have more and more tools like bispecific antibodies, CAR T-cells, to show that overall survival difference. But for me, I think what it tells us is that adding polatuzumab to frontline therapy does improve our chance of cure for a subset of patients, and we should continue to offer that therapy to the right patients.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.