Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ESH CLL 2022 | The importance of genomic testing in CLL prognosis

Anthony Mato, MD, MSCE, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, discusses the importance of genomic testing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dr Mato first explains that while the diagnosis of CLL is based on morphology and flow cytometry, genomic testing plays an important role in the prognosis of CLL. Dr Mato emphasizes the importance of using genomic testing to analyze DNA and better understand which mutations are driving the development of the cancer. Following this, Dr Mato explains that genomic testing is extremely important in understanding disease biology, as well as selecting the appropriate therapy for a patient. To conclude, Dr Mato gives an example of how genomic testing is used in the prognosis of CLL, and how this information can also help clinicians better understand mechanisms of resistance to approved agents. This interview took place during the 2nd ESH Translational Research Conference on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (ESH CLL), 2022.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

Well, genomic testing isn’t used in diagnosing patients with CLL. The diagnosis of CLL is still based on morphology and flow cytometry cell surface markers. Where genomic testing comes in is in terms of prognostic testing. So once you’ve identified a clone, that is a monoclonal B-cell population consistent with the diagnosis of CLL, you then want to look at the DNA to try to understand what mutations are driving the development of that cancer...

Well, genomic testing isn’t used in diagnosing patients with CLL. The diagnosis of CLL is still based on morphology and flow cytometry cell surface markers. Where genomic testing comes in is in terms of prognostic testing. So once you’ve identified a clone, that is a monoclonal B-cell population consistent with the diagnosis of CLL, you then want to look at the DNA to try to understand what mutations are driving the development of that cancer. That’s important, not only for helping us to understand the biology of the disease, how aggressive or indolent it will be, but most importantly now for helping to select appropriate therapies for patients. For example, a patient who has NextGen sequencing and has identified a p53 mutation should not be receiving chemo-immunotherapy under any circumstances. I think there’s a debate happening right now, whether those patients should be receiving a continuous therapy, for example, a BTK inhibitor or a time-limited approach and what would be more appropriate.

And so the genomic testing is not only important for prognosis, but for selecting first therapy, for example. And then the next area where it will be relevant is identifying mechanisms of resistance to currently approved targeted therapies. And once we know that piece of the puzzle, then it’ll be useful for selecting next therapies. For example, a patient who has a BTK mutation versus a PLC gamma 2 mutation might have different implications for selecting next therapy, following a covalent BTK inhibitor, for example. So very, very close or much closer these days to a personalized approach for patients. And certainly the genomic testing is really most important for helping us to get to that point.

 

Read more...

Disclosures

Research support: TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Johnson and Johnson, Acerta / AstraZeneca, DTRM BioPharma, Sunesis, BeiGene, Genentech, Genmab, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Nurix. Advisory/Consultancy/DSMB: TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Acerta / AstraZeneca, DTRM BioPharma, Sunesis, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Janssen, Loxo Oncology