Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

The evolving definition of high-risk multiple myeloma: new criteria

Charlotte Pawlyn, BA, MBBChir, MRCP, PhD, FRCPath, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, comments on the evolving definition of high-risk multiple myeloma. Dr Pawlyn highlights the need to translate the redefined high-risk criteria into clinical practice and clinical trials. This interview took place at the 22nd International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting in Toronto, Canada.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So we’ve heard a lot here at the meeting about the definition of high-risk disease for newly diagnosed myeloma patients. When we’re thinking about high-risk, we’re really meaning trying to understand what we could test in a patient bone marrow sample to identify changes that would be associated with myeloma that’s likely to be harder to treat or patients will have shorter periods of remission and therefore relapse earlier...

So we’ve heard a lot here at the meeting about the definition of high-risk disease for newly diagnosed myeloma patients. When we’re thinking about high-risk, we’re really meaning trying to understand what we could test in a patient bone marrow sample to identify changes that would be associated with myeloma that’s likely to be harder to treat or patients will have shorter periods of remission and therefore relapse earlier. And we’re trying to define this because we want to improve our ability to give prognostic information to patients, but also moving forward to be able to change our treatment approach for patients with high-risk disease. And earlier this year, a publication came out redefining high-risk criteria in myeloma. And it’s really important for us to think about how to translate that into our clinical practice, partly because it includes not only looking at changes using FISH diagnostics, but also looking at sequencing diagnostics, particularly for the TP53 gene. And it’s really important that we start to follow this approach and do this more uniformly, both in the real world, in clinical practice, but also in clinical trials, because hopefully then we can start to see how outcomes for patients with high-risk disease are hopefully improving over time with lots of the novel treatment approaches that we’ve also been hearing a lot about at the meeting.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Abbvie: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; iTEOS Therapeutics: Honoraria; Menarini Stemline: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.