Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Community Focus Channel is supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold).

The Multiple Myeloma Channel is supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze).

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

COMy 2024 | Choosing between ide-cel and cilta-cel for the treatment of R/R multiple myeloma

Saad Usmani, MD, MBA, FACP, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, discusses the roles of idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in treating multiple myeloma (MM). Following positive results from the KarMMa-2 (NCT03601078) and CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trials, these agents received FDA approval for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. Dr Usmani believes cilta-cel is preferable for younger patients, while ide-cel is better suited for older patients, particularly if there are concerns about neurological toxicities. This interview took place at The 10th World Congress on Controversies in Multiple Myeloma (COMy) in Paris, France.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Disclosures

Research funding: Amgen, Array Biopharma, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, Takeda.
Consulting: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, EdoPharma, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SecuraBio, SkylineDX, Takeda, TeneoBio.
Speaker: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi.